Heroes or Antiheroes: A Character of a True Identity

Literature has always been part of our daily lives. Authors from different parts of the world reach each composition part of the civilization or the whole cab atomic number 18t. In whatever story that we read, we crusade to understand its social perspectives and the ideologies of the characters. Some of the fictitious narratives talks about the ignorance, unlawfulities, and illogical implying of the society towards superb and evil. Because of power, some of us tend become irrational with our actions upright to fold that we are the authority.This is what the two stories authorise Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut and Saboteur by Ha Jin wants to impose to sits readers. From these two stories, it can be said that rase if we wants to ingest our lives equal and perfect, there are shut up certain situations that will tests our individuality to become heroes or antiheroes of the society. The main character in Vonneguts story is George Bergeron. His family lives a normal life b efore moreover because they were imprisoned by the military for a special case, their lives were ruined.George dreams of his son every night scarcely its all a dream. He wants to see Harrison but he knows he could non. George as the protagonist in the story is a depiction of social imprisonment and injustices. He is a combination of a supposition of hero and anti-hero. He is a hero of his family but an antihero of his enemies or the antagonists of his life. Harrison rebels against the government and the system. He escapes from the jail in order to turn d declare the government. It can be said as a form of individualism because Harrison thinks of his own resolution and not on the idea of fixing an issue.He wants to turndown the government for personal pursuance and to create his own monarchy. Through this, he became an antihero because he choose to become his own personality and not for the betterment of his society. However, the readers could not blame the characters for they are hopeless and helpless. They were burdened with sash weights and bags of birdshot, and their faces were masked, so that no one, perceive a free and graceful gesture or a pretty face, would feel like something the rove drug in (Vonnegut). They struggle in a immoral society just because they are skillful citizens and having a normal life. That is why even if they strive hard to become peaceful and work for their community, they still suffer. The equality did not exist right through their environment. On the other way around, Ha Jins story is a depiction of social immorality. The authority made irrational attacks towards other hoi polloi to prove their power and strength to show that they are right even if not. Mr.Chui, the main character of the story is a lecturer in a University in his community. He works hard and opens the eyes of many people for the betterment of their country and to prove their rights against immorality and social injustices. Mr. Chui is doing his jobs and responsibilities as citizen of his state. However, because it is not right for the authority who is implementing the immoral policy, they are seeing him as a convict of a crime, which he did not. On the glass background knowledge was a folder containing information on his case.He felt it bizarre that in just a calculate of hours they had accumulates a small pile of writing about him. On second thought he began to interrogate whether they had kept a file on him all the time (Ha). Mr. Chuis characterization in the stolon part is heroic but as the story reveals the main point of his character, it starts to work to become antihero because he needs to sacrifice his ideologies and beliefs for his friend and own identity. At the end of the story, he chooses to accept his crime just to be free.He turns down his beliefs and signs the confession in order to help his ex-student lawyer Fenjinto be stopped from existence tortured by the police officers. In connection of the two characters in the story, both Harrison and Mr. Chui, their selfish egos win. Mr. Chui spreads the hepatitis in Muji. He becomes the Saboteur they accuse him at the very radical. They both rebel against the system but then(prenominal) pursue their own interests. At the end of it all, the two stories leave the readers some initiatives and learning about the received situation of the society.The two stories are created in different form of culture but they are in some manner identical to one another. The authorities are immoral and unjustified with their actions. They want happiness and ego without destiny their people. The characters who suffer from all the threats and violence remain hopeless and helpless. What they claim to do is to surrender. They were heroes of their own cause but they became antiheroes of their own dignity. The authors of the stories made a significant attack against the authority of the society.They must know their limitations to make their society a better one for they are the implementers of law and they are treated as respectful individuals who make their people secured and free from harm so they must also bring back the respect for they are the authority. In conclusion to this, it can be said that the two characters in the stories are antiheroes. In the beginning of the narratives, they were imprisoned and they sacrifice more than what they expected because they have their own ideologies and beliefs.However, as they experience the threats and sacrifices within their path, they started to think for revenge against the system who tortured their character. If we look at the lighter perspective, we could not blame them from all the experiences that they have gone through. However, if we try to seek the deeper perspective of case, they will remain as antiheroes of the society because they work for their own monarchy and satisfaction and not for the betterment of their whole society. Works Cited Ha, Jin. Saboteur. Vonnegut, Kurt. Harrison Berge ron.